I make still lifes.
I aim to decode our relationship to objects, seeking why
they may carry associations of attraction and repulsion. Each item I work with
has an inherent relationship to me, but also shares a separate connotation with
the viewer. Therefore by isolating and depicting each object, I prompt the
audience to transform them through the projections of their associations.
I intend not only to compel the audience to make free
associations with objects, but also to spark a conversation about the act of
taking a photograph. The viewer’s experience is vital to the photograph being
able to support itself outside of the studio. When a conversation is sparked
around my work, I feel as if I have reached some sort of goal, especially when
that discourse branches into many different association “exercises” that reach
out into pop culture, history and specific comparisons. Though I am
intrinsically hinting at specific historical or photographical discourse, I am
always fascinated when the mind of the viewer chooses to take them in a
different direction. I mean to create imagery that works as a loose narrative
that forces the audience to interact with it through contemplation. I hope that
looking at my photographs initiates a peregrination of sorts, a type of image
that creates a rambling stream of conscious thinking. It is a very essential
part to my work that it is completed in this way by the viewer, and speaks to
me about what taking a photograph can mean.
My photographs propose to raise questions not only about the
objects themselves, but also about the photographer’s process in choosing and
arranging these objects. Through the introduction to the artist’s studio, a
conversation about the act of taking a photograph can also come into play. I
attempt to be present within my work without actually taking pictures of my
body. Therefore, I try to remind the viewer of the space in which the
photograph was taken, and challenge them to ask under what circumstances the
shutter was pushed.
I am extremely interested in my historical placement in the
genre of still life art. I am constantly asking myself questions. What does it
mean to make still lifes today? What does it mean to photograph still lifes,
instead of painting them as the masters did? Where am I situated in the history
of the genre? Why do I feel the need to continue the traditions of the genre? How
do I add a new discourse to the many already surrounding still life? I intend
to continue using historical still life tropes to perform new ideas that
ultimately surround the genre. I am uninterested in transcending the genre, but
aim to ground myself completely and fully within the still life history in
order to burrow my way deeper into its meaning and importance. There is a
reason a specific genre proceeds in art through generations; I intend to
continually question why still life has existed for so long a period.
The photographs I make must be abstract enough to remain
both objective and familiar simultaneously.
No comments:
Post a Comment